UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist
gegebenenfalls
nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Suche
Details
Zur Ergebnisliste
Ergebnis 12 von 215
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
A comparison of questionnaires for assessing physical function in patients with lower extremity bone metastases
Journal of surgical oncology, 2016-11, Vol.114 (6), p.691-696
Janssen, Stein J.
Paulino Pereira, Nuno Rui
Raskin, Kevin A.
Ferrone, Marco L.
Hornicek, Francis J.
van Dijk, C. Niek
Lozano-Calderón, Santiago A.
Schwab, Joseph H.
2016
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Janssen, Stein J.
Paulino Pereira, Nuno Rui
Raskin, Kevin A.
Ferrone, Marco L.
Hornicek, Francis J.
van Dijk, C. Niek
Lozano-Calderón, Santiago A.
Schwab, Joseph H.
Titel
A comparison of questionnaires for assessing physical function in patients with lower extremity bone metastases
Ist Teil von
Journal of surgical oncology, 2016-11, Vol.114 (6), p.691-696
Ort / Verlag
United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Wiley Blackwell Single Titles
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Objectives To assess, (i) the degree to which the: PROMIS Physical Function Cancer, PROMIS Neuro‐QoL Mobility, Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), Lower Extremity Function Score (LEFS), and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS), measure physical function; (ii) differences in coverage and reliability; and (iii) difference in completion time. Methods One hundred of 115 (87%) patients with lower extremity metastases participated in this prospective study. We used exploratory factor analysis—correlating questionnaires with an underlying trait—to assess if questionnaires measure the same. Coverage was assessed by floor and ceiling effect and reliability by the standard error of measurement (SEM). Completion time was compared using the Friedman test. Results All questionnaires measured the same concept; demonstrated by high correlations (>0.7). Floor effect was absent, while ceiling effect was present in all, but highest for the PROMIS Neuro‐QoL Mobility (7%). The SEM was below the threshold—indicating reliability—over a wide range of ability levels for the PROMIS‐Physical Function, TESS, and LEFS. Completion time differed between questionnaires (P < 0.001) and was shortest for the PROMIS questionnaires. Conclusions The PROMIS Physical Function is the most useful questionnaire. This is due to its reliability over a wide range of ability levels, validity, brevity, and good coverage. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:691–696. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0022-4790
eISSN: 1096-9098
DOI: 10.1002/jso.24400
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835690545
Format
–
Schlagworte
Adolescent
,
Adult
,
Aged
,
Aged, 80 and over
,
bone
,
Bone Neoplasms - physiopathology
,
Bone Neoplasms - secondary
,
Factor Analysis, Statistical
,
Female
,
function
,
Health Status Indicators
,
Humans
,
Leg Bones
,
Male
,
metastasis
,
Middle Aged
,
Pelvic Bones
,
Prospective Studies
,
Reproducibility of Results
,
Young Adult
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX