Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 16 von 148
Endocrine-related cancer, 2015-08, Vol.22 (4), p.561-575
2015
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Blood and tissue neuroendocrine tumor gene cluster analysis correlate, define hallmarks and predict disease status
Ist Teil von
  • Endocrine-related cancer, 2015-08, Vol.22 (4), p.561-575
Ort / Verlag
England: Bioscientifica Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • A multianalyte algorithmic assay (MAAA) identifies circulating neuroendocrine tumor (NET) transcripts (n=51) with a sensitivity/specificity of 98%/97%. We evaluated whether blood measurements correlated with tumor tissue transcript analysis. The latter were segregated into gene clusters (GC) that defined clinical ‘hallmarks’ of neoplasia. A MAAA/cluster integrated algorithm (CIA) was developed as a predictive activity index to define tumor behavior and outcome. We evaluated three groups. Group 1: publically available NET transcriptome databases (n=15; GeneProfiler). Group 2: prospectively collected tumors and matched blood samples (n=22; qRT-PCR). Group 3: prospective clinical blood samples, n=159: stable disease (SD): n=111 and progressive disease (PD): n=48. Regulatory network analysis, linear modeling, principal component analysis (PCA), and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to delineate neoplasia ‘hallmarks’ and assess GC predictive utility. Our results demonstrated: group 1: NET transcriptomes identified (92%) genes elevated. Group 2: 98% genes elevated by qPCR (fold change >2, P<0.05). Correlation analysis of matched blood/tumor was highly significant (R2=0.7, P<0.0001), and 58% of genes defined nine omic clusters (SSTRome, proliferome, signalome, metabolome, secretome, epigenome, plurome, and apoptome). Group 3: six clusters (SSTRome, proliferome, metabolome, secretome, epigenome, and plurome) differentiated SD from PD (area under the curve (AUC)=0.81). Integration with blood-algorithm amplified the AUC to 0.92±0.02 for differentiating PD and SD. The CIA defined a significantly lower SD score (34.1±2.6%) than in PD (84±2.8%, P<0.0001). In conclusion, circulating transcripts measurements reflect NET tissue values. Integration of biologically relevant GC differentiate SD from PD. Combination of GC data with the blood-algorithm predicted disease status in >92%. Blood transcript measurement predicts NET activity.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1351-0088
eISSN: 1479-6821
DOI: 10.1530/ERC-15-0092
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827919556

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX