UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist
gegebenenfalls
nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Suche
Details
Zur Ergebnisliste
Ergebnis 21 von 113546
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
'I didn't even know boys could get the vaccine': Parents' reasons for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination decision making for their sons
Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2015-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1316-1323
Perez, Samara
Shapiro, Gilla K.
Brown, Christopher A.
Dube, Eve
Ogilvie, Gina
Rosberger, Zeev
2015
Volltextzugriff (PDF)
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Perez, Samara
Shapiro, Gilla K.
Brown, Christopher A.
Dube, Eve
Ogilvie, Gina
Rosberger, Zeev
Titel
'I didn't even know boys could get the vaccine': Parents' reasons for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination decision making for their sons
Ist Teil von
Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2015-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1316-1323
Ort / Verlag
England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Quelle
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Objective The study's objective was to examine parents' reasons for their decision to vaccinate their 9–16‐year‐old sons with the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Methods Using the precaution adoption process model (PAPM), parents were classified according to one of six stages of decision making: unaware, unengaged, undecided, decided not to vaccinate, decided to vaccinate, or vaccinated. Parents responded to an open‐ended question: ‘What would influence your decision to have your son vaccinated or not against HPV?’ Results Three thousand one hundred and seventeen parents provided 2,874 interpretable narrative responses that were coded using thematic content analyses. The majority of parents were in the earlier precaution adoption process model stages, that is, unaware that the HPV vaccine could be given to boys (57.0%), unengaged (20.9%), or undecided (9.1%). Needing more information, vaccine cost, risks associated with vaccination, and wanting a doctor's recommendation influenced these earlier‐staged parents' decisions. Parents who decided not to vaccinate their sons (6.8%) reported their decision was due to the risks, insufficient research, lack of confidence in vaccines, and/or no need for the vaccine (as their sons are not sexually active and/or too young). Parents who had decided to vaccinate their sons (5.0%) or who had vaccinated their sons (1.1%) reported that their decisions were based on protecting their sons' health and preventing disease. Conclusion There are important differences in the factors that influence parents' decision depending on where they are along the decision‐making trajectory. Assuring that parents are well informed about the importance of male vaccination, reducing vaccine cost, accurately communicating vaccine safety, and improving patient–provider communication may augment vaccine coverage and prevent HPV‐associated cancers in Canada. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1057-9249
eISSN: 1099-1611
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3894
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826628429
Format
–
Schlagworte
Adoptive parents
,
Boys
,
Cancer
,
Content analysis
,
Coverage
,
Decision making
,
Human papillomavirus
,
Immunization
,
Parents & parenting
,
Patient communication
,
Physician patient relationships
,
Safety
,
Sexual behavior
,
Sons
,
Vaccines
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX