Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Devoe, Daniel J., MSc
• Wong, Ben, MD, MSc
• James, Matthew T., MD, PhD
• Ravani, Pietro, MD, PhD
• Oliver, Matthew J., MD, MHS
• Barnieh, Lianne, PhD
• Roberts, Derek J., MD, PhD
• Pauly, Robert, MD, MSc
• Manns, Braden J., MD, MSc
• Kappel, Joanne, MD
• Quinn, Robert R., MD, PhD

Titel

Patient Education and Peritoneal Dialysis Modality Selection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ist Teil von

• American journal of kidney diseases, 2016-09, Vol.68 (3), p.422-433

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2016

Quelle

Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Educational interventions are increasingly used to promote peritoneal dialysis (PD), the most common form of home therapy for end-stage renal disease. A systematic review of the evidence in support of dialysis modality education is needed to inform the design of patient-targeted interventions to increase selection of PD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize the relationship between patient-targeted educational interventions and choosing and receiving PD. Study Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting & Population Published original studies and abstracts. Selection Criteria for Studies We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and EBMR. We included controlled observational studies and randomized trials of educational interventions designed to increase PD selection. Intervention Predialysis educational interventions. Outcomes The primary outcome was choosing PD, defined as intention to use PD regardless of whether PD was ever used. The secondary outcome, receiving PD, was defined as an individual receiving PD as his or her treatment. Results Of 3,540 citations, 15 studies met our inclusion criteria, including 1 randomized trial. In the single randomized trial (N = 70), receipt of an educational intervention was associated with a more than 4-fold increase in the odds of choosing PD (OR, 4.60; 95% CI, 1.19-17.74). Based on results from 4 observational studies (N = 7,653), patient-targeted educational interventions were associated with a 2-fold increase in the odds of choosing PD (pooled OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.07-4.32; I2 = 76.7%). Based on results from 9 observational studies (N = 8,229), patient-targeted educational intervention was associated with a 3-fold increase in the odds of receiving PD as the initial treatment modality (OR, 3.50; 95% CI, 2.82-4.35; I2 = 24.9%). Limitations Most studies were observational studies, which can establish an association between education and choosing PD or receiving PD, but does not establish causality. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrates a strong association between patient-targeted education interventions and the subsequent choice and receipt of PD.