Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 22 von 7271
Research in developmental disabilities, 2016-08, Vol.55, p.377-387
2016

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Thinking styles of university deaf or hard of hearing students and hearing students
Ist Teil von
  • Research in developmental disabilities, 2016-08, Vol.55, p.377-387
Ort / Verlag
United States: Elsevier Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • •Intellectual styles refer to individuals’ preferred ways of processing information and dealing with tasks.•Results showed that the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II was reliable and valid among DHH (deaf or hard of hearing) and hearing students.•DHH students tended to score lower on Type I thinking styles (legislative and global), Type II executive style, and Type III external style than hearing students.•Differences in Type I styles (liberal and hierarchical) and Type II executive style between DHH and hearing students were significantly influenced by institution. Although their university enrollment has increased dramatically over the past two decades, deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) students face great challenges and a tremendous environmental adjustment when entering a mainstream university. This study aims to facilitate DHH students’ university success through exploring differences in thinking styles between DHH and hearing students from Art and Design academic disciplines in two universities in China. The Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II (TSI-R2) and its accommodated version were administered to 286 hearing and 256 DHH students, respectively. A demographic sheet was administered to all 542 participants. Results show that DHH students tended to score significantly lower on Type I thinking styles (legislative and global), Type II executive style, and Type III external style than hearing students. In addition, differences in Type I styles (liberal and hierarchical) and Type II executive style between DHH and hearing students were significantly influenced by institution. The present research indicates that DHH and hearing students have significant differences in their thinking styles. This yields implications for the higher education of DHH students, and for deaf schools preparing DHH students for university entry.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0891-4222
eISSN: 1873-3379
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.04.004
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1807277941

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX