Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Long‐Term Exposure to Belatacept in Recipients of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys
Ist Teil von
American journal of transplantation, 2013-11, Vol.13 (11), p.2884-2891
Ort / Verlag
Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
Erscheinungsjahr
2013
Quelle
Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Patients in the BENEFIT‐EXT study received extended criteria donor kidneys and a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept immunosuppression regimen, or cyclosporine A (CsA). Patients who remained on assigned therapy through year 3 were eligible to enter a long‐term extension (LTE) study. Three hundred four patients entered the LTE (n = 104 MI; n = 113 LI; n = 87 CsA), and 260 continued treatment through year 5 (n = 91 MI; n = 100 LI; n = 69 CsA). Twenty patients died during the LTE (n = 5 MI; n = 9 LI; n = 6 CsA), and eight experienced graft loss (n = 2 MI; n = 1 LI; n = 5 CsA). Three patients experienced an acute rejection episode (n = 2 MI; n = 1 LI). The incidence rate of serious adverse events, viral infections and fungal infections was similar across groups during the LTE. There were four cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) from the beginning of the LTE to year 5 (n = 3 LI; n = 1 CsA); two of three PTLD cases in the LI group were in patients who were seronegative for Epstein–Barr virus (EBV(−)) at transplantation. Mean ± SD calculated GFR at year 5 was 55.9 ± 17.5 (MI), 59.0 ± 29.1 (LI) and 44.6 ± 16.4 (CsA) mL/min/1.73 m2. Continued treatment with belatacept was associated with a consistent safety profile and sustained improvement in renal function versus CsA over time.
Recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys in the BENEFIT‐EXT study who continued treatment with belatacept in a long‐term study extension exhibited a consistent safety profile and maintained an 11‒14 mL/min/1.73 m2 higher GFR versus cyclosporine at 5 years posttransplant. Also see article by Rostaing et al on page 2875.