Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Triple-Nucleoside Regimens versus Efavirenz-Containing Regimens for the Initial Treatment of HIV-1 Infection
Ist Teil von
The New England journal of medicine, 2004-04, Vol.350 (18), p.1850-1861
Ort / Verlag
Boston, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society
Erscheinungsjahr
2004
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Protease-sparing regimens are often used in the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. This double-blind trial was stopped after an interim analysis showed poorer virologic responses with the triple-nucleoside-analogue regimen of zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir than with regimens containing efavirenz, a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor, plus two or three nucleoside analogues.
An interim analysis showed poorer virologic responses with the triple-nucleoside-analogue regimen.
Antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection decreases viremia, increases CD4 cell counts, and delays clinical progression and death.
1
–
5
Current treatment guidelines recommend initial therapy with one or more protease inhibitors or a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor together with two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors.
6
,
7
Though effective, protease-inhibitor–based regimens are complex and have been associated with side effects such as hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance.
8
–
10
Regimens containing nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors are often preferred because of their demonstrated efficacy
11
–
13
and convenience.
14
Triple-nucleoside regimens are an alternative to regimens containing nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors.
6
,
7
Triple-nucleoside combinations . . .