Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Conventionalism about what? Where Duhem and Poincaré part ways
Ist Teil von
Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A, 2015-12, Vol.54, p.80-89
Ort / Verlag
England: Elsevier Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
This paper examines whether, and in what contexts, Duhem's and Poincaré's views can be regarded as conventionalist or structural realist. After analysing the three different contexts in which conventionalism is attributed to them—in the context of the aim of science, the underdetermination problem and the epistemological status of certain principles—I show that neither Duhem's nor Poincaré's arguments can be regarded as conventionalist. I argue that Duhem and Poincaré offer different solutions to the problem of theory choice, differ in their stances towards scientific knowledge and the status of scientific principles, making their epistemological claims substantially different.
•Pierre Duhem's and Henri Poincaré's views on scientific knowledge are examined.•Conventionalism does not capture their solutions to theory choice and rationality.•Conventionalism does not fully describe their epistemology of science