Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 10 von 71
European journal of internal medicine, 2015-07, Vol.26 (6), p.414-419
2015
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Inpatient versus outpatient onsets of acute myocardial infarction
Ist Teil von
  • European journal of internal medicine, 2015-07, Vol.26 (6), p.414-419
Ort / Verlag
Netherlands: Elsevier B.V
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Quelle
ScienceDirect
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Abstract Background There are few studies on patients suffering acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when already in hospital for other reasons; therefore, this study aimed to compare patients with in-hospital-onset AMI admitted for either medical or surgical reasons versus patients with outpatient-onset AMI. Methods Patients enrolled in the AMIS Plus registry from 2002 to 2014 were analyzed. The main endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Results Among 35,394 AMI patients, 356 (1%) had inpatient-onset AMI following hospital admission due to other pathologies (surgical 175, non-surgical 181). These patients were older (74 vs. 66 years; P < 0.001), more often female (35% vs. 27%; P < 0.001), had less frequently ST-elevation myocardial infarction (35.5% vs. 55.5%; P < 0.001), but higher risk profiles: hypertension (83% vs. 62%; P < 0.001), diabetes (28% vs. 20%; P = 0.001), known coronary artery disease (54% vs. 35%; P < 0.001), and more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index above 1 in 51% vs. 22%; P < 0.001) than those with outpatient-onset AMI. Percutaneous coronary intervention was less frequently applied (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.36–0.57), and they were less likely to be treated with aspirin (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.37–0.59), P2Y12 blockers (OR 0.42; 0.34–0.52) or statins (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.41–0.63). Crude mortality was higher (14.3% vs. 5.5%; P < 0.001) and inpatient-onset AMI was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.63–3.39; P < 0.001). Conclusions Patients with in-hospital-onset AMI were at greater risk of death than those with outpatient-onset AMI. More work is needed to improve the identification of hospitalized patients at risk of AMI in order to provide the appropriate management.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX