Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 4 von 7
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2015-09, Vol.94 (9), p.954-959
2015

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Intestinal surgery performed by gynecologists
Ist Teil von
  • Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2015-09, Vol.94 (9), p.954-959
Ort / Verlag
United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Wiley-Blackwell Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Introduction Our objective was to compare the feasibility and safety of surgical procedures to treat gynecological pathologies with intestinal involvement performed by skilled gynecological surgeons and by a multidisciplinary team of gynecologists plus colorectal surgeons. Material and methods We performed a comparative, observational, prospective study at a tertiary referral center. The population included all women undergoing bowel surgery for gynecological pathologies over a 3‐year period. Cases were analyzed by the specialty of the main surgeon performing the intestinal procedure. The main outcome measures were surgical procedure characteristics and postoperative outcomes and complications. Results A total of 65 women were included. Surgery was exclusively performed by a subspecialized gynecologist in 30.8% of the women, and undertaken by a multidisciplinary team (colorectal surgeons and gynecologists) in 69.2%. The main demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable in both groups. Main indications for bowel resection in gynecological surgery were advanced ovarian cancer and deep infiltrating endometriosis. In addition to the standard gynecological surgical procedures, a total of 135 intestinal segments were resected, with sigmoid colon the most frequent intestinal segment resected in both groups (53% in the gynecologist group and in 60% in the multidisciplinary group). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the distribution and frequency of surgical techniques used, rate of complications, mean hospitalization time or frequency of re‐intervention. Conclusion Skilled gynecological surgeons appear to be equally good at handling common intestinal problems as a team of gynecologist and colorectal surgeons.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX