Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Fracture toughness of heat-pressed and layered ceramics
Ist Teil von
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2013-04, Vol.109 (4), p.234-240
Ort / Verlag
United States: Mosby, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2013
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Statement of problem Veneering ceramic materials designed to be used with high noble alloy and zirconia-based restorations have been reported to be susceptible to chipping in vivo. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the fracture toughness of heat-pressed and layered ceramics intended for zirconia and high-noble alloy substrates. Material and methods Bar specimens were fabricated from 8 different ceramics (Ivoclar-Vivadent [I] and Noritake [N]) intended for pressing (P) and layering (L) to high noble alloy (M) and zirconia (Z) substrates, following the ISO 6872 protocol. The single edge notch beam test method was used to create a notch in the center of each specimen, which was then tested with a universal testing machine (n=6, cross-head speed=0.5 mm/min) and the fracture force values recorded. These values were used to calculate the fracture toughness (K1c ) for each specimen. Fracture surfaces were examined with a scanning electron microscope, and the basic components of the tested ceramics were determined by using energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. Data were analyzed with 3-way ANOVA, followed by multiple comparisons using the Holm method (α=.05). Results The mean (SD) of the calculated fracture toughness values obtained ranged from 1.20 (0.04) MPa·m1/2 (group NZL) to 1.74 (0.04) MPa·m1/2 (group IZL). Fracture toughness was significantly higher in group IZL (1.74) than group IZP (1.41), but lower in group NZL (1.20) than group NZP (1.36) ( P <.001). Fracture toughness was somewhat lower in group IML (1.36) than group IMP (1.47) ( P =.018), and no significant difference was found between group NML and group NMP ( P =.14). Veneering ceramics used with a metal substrate showed a crystalline structure mixed with a glassy phase pattern on the fracture surface. The results of EDX analysis on the fracture surfaces indicated that the tested ceramics were composed of Si, Al, K, Na, Mg, and oxygen elements. Conclusions Ceramics used for veneering zirconia substrate may have various fracture toughness values that relate primarily to the processing technique.