Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Assessment of simulated water balance from Noah, Noah-MP, CLM, and VIC over CONUS using the NLDAS test bed
Ist Teil von
Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2014-12, Vol.119 (24), p.13,751-13,770
Ort / Verlag
Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Quelle
Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
This study assesses the hydrologic performance of four land surface models (LSMs) for the conterminous United States using the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) test bed. The four LSMs are the baseline community Noah LSM (Noah, version 2.8), the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC, version 4.0.5) model, the substantially augmented Noah LSM with multiparameterization options (hence Noah‐MP), and the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4). All four models are driven by the same NLDAS‐2 atmospheric forcing. Modeled terrestrial water storage (TWS), streamflow, evapotranspiration (ET), and soil moisture are compared with each other and evaluated against the identical observations. Relative to Noah, the other three models offer significant improvements in simulating TWS and streamflow and moderate improvements in simulating ET and soil moisture. Noah‐MP provides the best performance in simulating soil moisture and is among the best in simulating TWS, CLM4 shows the best performance in simulating ET, and VIC ranks the highest in performing the streamflow simulations. Despite these improvements, CLM4, Noah‐MP, and VIC exhibit deficiencies, such as the low variability of soil moisture in CLM4, the fast growth of spring ET in Noah‐MP, and the constant overestimation of ET in VIC.
Key Points
Noah‐MP provides the best simulations of soil moisture and TWSCLM4 shows the best performance in simulating ETVIC ranks the highest in performing the streamflow simulations