Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 25 von 44
Journal of geophysical research. Planets, 2014-12, Vol.119 (12), p.2640-2657
2014
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Constraints on abundance, composition, and nature of X-ray amorphous components of soils and rocks at Gale crater, Mars
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of geophysical research. Planets, 2014-12, Vol.119 (12), p.2640-2657
Ort / Verlag
Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Quelle
Wiley Online Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • X‐ray diffraction patterns of the three samples analyzed by Curiosity's Chemistry and Mineralogy (CheMin) instrument during the first year of the Mars Science Laboratory mission—the Rocknest sand, and the John Klein and Cumberland drill fines, both extracted from the Sheepbed mudstone—show evidence for a significant amorphous component of unclear origin. We developed a mass balance calculation program that determines the range of possible chemical compositions of the crystalline and amorphous components of these samples within the uncertainties of mineral abundances derived from CheMin data. In turn, the chemistry constrains the minimum abundance of amorphous component required to have realistic compositions (all oxides ≥ 0 wt %): 21–22 wt % for Rocknest and 15–20 wt % for Cumberland, in good agreement with estimates derived from the diffraction patterns (~27 and ~31 wt %, respectively). Despite obvious differences between the Rocknest sand and the Sheepbed mudstone, the amorphous components of the two sites are chemically very similar, having comparable concentrations of SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, Cr2O3, FeOT, CaO, Na2O, K2O, and P2O5. MgO tends to be lower in Rocknest, although it may also be comparable between the two samples depending on the exact composition of the smectite in Sheepbed. The only unambiguous difference is the SO3 content, which is always higher in Rocknest. The observed similarity suggests that the two amorphous components share a common origin or formation process. The individual phases possibly present within the amorphous components include: volcanic (or impact) glass, hisingerite (or silica + ferrihydrite), amorphous sulfates (or adsorbed SO42−), and nanophase ferric oxides. Key Points X‐ray amorphous components are detected within samples studied by CuriosityThe range of possible compositions of the amorphous components is presentedThe amorphous components of Rocknest and Sheepbed are very similar

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX