Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Research results on the effects of land cover change on water resources vary greatly and the topic remains controversial. Here we use published data worldwide to examine the validity of Fuh’s equation, which relates annual water yield (
R
) to a wetness index (precipitation/potential evapotranspiration;
P
/
PET
) and watershed characteristics (
m
). We identify two critical values at
P
/
PET
=1 and
m
=2.
m
plays a more important role than
P
/
PET
when
m
<2, and a lesser role when
m
>2. When
P
/
PET
<1, the relative water yield (
R
/
P
) is more responsive to changes in
m
than it is when
P
/
PET
>1, suggesting that any land cover changes in non-humid regions (
P
/
PET
<1) or in watersheds of low water retention capacity (
m
<2) can lead to greater hydrological responses.
m
significantly correlates with forest coverage, watershed slope and watershed area. This global pattern has far-reaching significance in studying and managing hydrological responses to land cover and climate changes.
The effects of forests on water yield are uncertain, with some studies indicating that increased evapotranspiration reduces water yield and other showing that forests increase it. Here, the authors analyse published data to settle this debate, finding that afforestation has a positive effect on water yield.