Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Chen, Ping Min, MD
• Lai, Tai Shuan, MD
• Chen, Ping Yu, MD
• Lai, Chun Fu, MD
• Yang, Shao Yu, MD
• Wu, VinCent, MD, PhD
• Chiang, Chih Kang, MD, PhD
• Kao, Tze Wah, MD, PhD
• Huang, Jenq Wen, MD, PhD
• Chiang, Wen Chih, MD, PhD
• Lin, Shuei Liong, MD, PhD
• Hung, Kuan Yu, MD, PhD
• Chen, Yung Ming, MD
• Chu, Tzong Shinn, MD, PhD
• Wu, Ming Shiou, MD, PhD
• Wu, Kwan Dun, MD, PhD
• Tsai, Tun Jun, MD, PhD

Titel

Multidisciplinary Care Program for Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Reduces Renal Replacement and Medical Costs

Ist Teil von

• The American journal of medicine, 2015, Vol.128 (1), p.68-76

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2015

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background Multidisciplinary care is advocated as an effective chronic kidney disease treatment program in a few, but not all, studies. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of multidisciplinary care on renal outcome and patient survival using a larger cohort. Method A total 1382 chronic kidney disease patients, ages 18-80 years, with chronic kidney disease stage 3B-5, in nephrology outpatient clinics were enrolled. Using age, sex, chronic kidney disease stage, and diabetes mellitus as variables, 592 multidisciplinary care program participants were matched with 614 nonmultidisciplinary care patients. The primary outcomes were long-term renal replacement therapy and mortality. Secondary outcomes included changes of biochemical markers and blood pressure, infection hospitalization, cardiovascular events, and emergent start of long-term dialysis. Annual medical costs were compared. Results There were no between-group differences regarding mortality. In the multivariate competing-risk regression model, the multidisciplinary care group had a better renal survival (hazard ratio 0.640; 95% confidence interval, 0.484-0.847; P  = .002). This effect was most prominent in stage 4 (hazard ratio 0.375; 95% confidence interval, 0.219-0.640; P < .001), but not in stage 3B and 5 patients. The multidisciplinary care group showed a slower estimated glomerular filtration rate decline (−2.57 vs −3.74 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P  = .021), and a smaller increase in phosphate (+ 0.03 vs + 0.33 mg/dL, P  = .013). Cardiovascular and infection events were both decreased in the multidisciplinary care group ( P < .001). There was also less requirement of emergent start dialysis (39.6% vs 54.5%, P  = .001). The annual cost for the multidisciplinary care group was lower than the nonmultidisciplinary care group (US $2372 vs $3794, P < .001). In addition, considering the reduction of patients requiring renal replacement therapy, the multidisciplinary care program saved a total US $1931 per patient annually. Conclusions Our analysis demonstrated that the multidisciplinary care program provided better health care and reduced renal replacement therapy in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. By decreasing hospitalizations, emergent start, and the need for renal replacement therapy, the multidisciplinary care program was cost-effective.