Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 3 von 3
American Industrial Hygiene Association journal, 1993-02, Vol.54 (2), p.61-69
1993

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
ASSESSMENT OF ARSENIC EXPOSURES AND CONTROLS IN GALLIUM ARSENIDE PRODUCTION
Ist Teil von
  • American Industrial Hygiene Association journal, 1993-02, Vol.54 (2), p.61-69
Ort / Verlag
Fairfax, VA: TAYLOR & FRANCIS
Erscheinungsjahr
1993
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • The electronics industry is expanding the use of gallium arsenide in the production of optoelectronic devices and integrated circuits. Workers in the electronics industry using gallium arsenide are exposed to hazardous substances such as arsenic, arsine, and various acids. Arsenic requires stringent controls to minimize exposures (the current OSHA PEL for arsenic is 10 μ/m3 and the NIOSH REL is 2 μ/m3 ceiling). Inorganic arsenic is strongly implicated in respiratory tract and skin cancer. For these reasons, NIOSH researchers conducted a study of control systems for facilities using gallium arsenide. Seven walk-through surveys were performed to identify locations for detailed study which appeared to have effective controls; three facilities were chosen for in-depth evaluation. The controls were evaluated by industrial hygiene sampling, including personal breathing zone and area air sampling for arsenic and arsine; wipe samples for arsenic also were collected. Work practices and the use of personal protective equipment were documented. This paper reports on the controls and the arsenic exposure results from the evaluation of the following gallium arsenide processes: Liquid Encapsulated Czochralski (LEC) and Horizontal Bridgeman (HB) crystal growing, LEC cleaning operations, ingot grinding/wafer sawing, and epitaxy. Results at one plant showed that in all processes except epitaxy, average arsenic exposures were at or above the OSHA action level of 5 μ/m3. While cleaning the LEC crystal pullers, the average potential arsenic exposure of the cleaning operators was 100 times the OSHA PEL. At the other two plants, personal exposures for arsenic were well controlled in LEC, LEC cleaning, grinding/sawing, and epitaxy operations.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX