Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Arlen, Angela M
• Merriman, Laura S
• Heiss, Kurt F
• Cerwinka, Wolfgang H
• Elmore, James M
• Massad, Charlotte A
• Smith, Edwin A
• Broecker, Bruce H
• Scherz, Hal C
• Kirsch, Andrew J

Titel

Emergency room visits and readmissions after pediatric urologic surgery

Ist Teil von

• Journal of pediatric urology, 2014-08, Vol.10 (4), p.712-716

Ort / Verlag

England: Elsevier Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2014

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Objective Reducing readmissions has become a focal point to increase quality of care while reducing costs. We report all-cause unplanned return visits following urologic surgery in children at our institution. Materials and methods Children undergoing urology procedures with returns within 30 days of surgery were identified. Patient demographics, insurance status, type of surgery, and reason for return were assessed. Results Four thousand and ninety-seven pediatric urology surgeries were performed at our institution during 2012, with 106 documented unplanned returns (2.59%). Mean time from discharge to return was 5.9 ± 4.9 days (range, 0.3–24.8 days). Returns were classified by chief complaint, including pain (32), infection (30), volume status (14), bleeding (11), catheter concern (8), and other (11). Circumcision, hypospadias repair, and inguinal/scrotal procedures led to the majority of return visits, accounting for 21.7%, 20.7%, and 18.9% of returns, respectively. Twenty-two returns (20.75%) resulted in hospital readmission and five (4.72%) required a secondary procedure. Overall readmission rate was 0.54%, with a reoperation rate of 0.12%. Conclusions The rate of unplanned postoperative returns in the pediatric population undergoing urologic surgery is low, further strengthening the argument that readmission rates in children are not necessarily a productive focal point for financial savings or quality control.