Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Lu, Dan
• Ye, Ming
• Hill, Mary C.

Titel

Analysis of regression confidence intervals and Bayesian credible intervals for uncertainty quantification

Ist Teil von

• Water resources research, 2012-09, Vol.48 (9), p.np-n/a

Ort / Verlag

Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2012

Quelle

Wiley-Blackwell Journals

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Confidence intervals based on classical regression theories augmented to include prior information and credible intervals based on Bayesian theories are conceptually different ways to quantify parametric and predictive uncertainties. Because both confidence and credible intervals are used in environmental modeling, we seek to understand their differences and similarities. This is of interest in part because calculating confidence intervals typically requires tens to thousands of model runs, while Bayesian credible intervals typically require tens of thousands to millions of model runs. Given multi‐Gaussian distributed observation errors, our theoretical analysis shows that, for linear or linearized‐nonlinear models, confidence and credible intervals are always numerically identical when consistent prior information is used. For nonlinear models, nonlinear confidence and credible intervals can be numerically identical if parameter confidence regions defined using the approximate likelihood method and parameter credible regions estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo realizations are numerically identical and predictions are a smooth, monotonic function of the parameters. Both occur if intrinsic model nonlinearity is small. While the conditions of Gaussian errors and small intrinsic model nonlinearity are violated by many environmental models, heuristic tests using analytical and numerical models suggest that linear and nonlinear confidence intervals can be useful approximations of uncertainty even under significantly nonideal conditions. In the context of epistemic model error for a complex synthetic nonlinear groundwater problem, the linear and nonlinear confidence and credible intervals for individual models performed similarly enough to indicate that the computationally frugal confidence intervals can be useful in many circumstances. Experiences with these groundwater models are expected to be broadly applicable to many environmental models. We suggest that for environmental problems with lengthy execution times that make credible intervals inconvenient or prohibitive, confidence intervals can provide important insight. During model development when frequent calculation of uncertainty intervals is important to understanding the consequences of various model construction alternatives and data collection strategies, strategic use of both confidence and credible intervals can be critical. Key Points Nonlinear confidence and credible intervals are always different in practice Model nonlinearity and local minima affect difference between the intervals Model error is more important than differences between different intervals