Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 17 von 78
Journal of fluency disorders, 2013-03, Vol.38 (1), p.1-13
2013
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Inhibitory control in childhood stuttering
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of fluency disorders, 2013-03, Vol.38 (1), p.1-13
Ort / Verlag
Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2013
Quelle
ERIC
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • ► CWS exhibited more false alarms and premature responses on the Go/NoGo task. ► CWS showed lower reaction times for false alarms on the Go/NoGo task. ► CWS were less able to adapt their response style after experiencing response errors. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether previously reported parental questionnaire-based differences in inhibitory control (IC; Eggers, De Nil, & Van den Bergh, 2010) would be supported by direct measurement of IC using a computer task. Participants were 30 children who stutter (CWS; mean age=7;05 years) and 30 children who not stutter (CWNS; mean age=7;05 years). Participants were matched on age and gender (±3 months). IC was assessed by the Go/NoGo task of the Amsterdam Neuropsychological Tasks (De Sonneville, 2009). Results indicated that CWS, compared to CWNS, (a) exhibited more false alarms and premature responses, (b) showed lower reaction times for false alarms, and (c) were less able to adapt their response style after experiencing response errors. Our findings provide further support for the hypothesis that CWS and CWNS differ on IC. CWS, as a group, were lower in IC pointing toward a lowered ability to inhibit prepotent response tendencies. The findings were linked to previous IC-related studies and to emerging theoretical frameworks of stuttering development.Educational objectives: The reader will be able to: (1) describe the concept of inhibitory control, and its functional significance; (2) describe the findings on self-regulatory processes, attentional processes, and inhibitory control in CWS; (3) identify which Go/NoGo task variables differentiated between CWS and CWNS; and (4) summarize the theoretical implications for the development of stuttering and the possible clinical implications.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX