Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Declerck, Carolyn H.
• Boone, Christophe
• Emonds, Griet

Titel

When do people cooperate? The neuroeconomics of prosocial decision making

Ist Teil von

• Brain and cognition, 2013-02, Vol.81 (1), p.95-117

Ort / Verlag

Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2013

Quelle

ERIC

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• ► Extrinsic incentives and trust signals are two independent drivers of cooperation. ► Cooperative decisions rely on cognitive control and/or social cognition. ► A cooperative decision results due to modulation of the brain’s reward system. ► Individual differences in cooperation may reflect variation in neural sensitivities. Understanding the roots of prosocial behavior is an interdisciplinary research endeavor that has generated an abundance of empirical data across many disciplines. This review integrates research findings from different fields into a novel theoretical framework that can account for when prosocial behavior is likely to occur. Specifically, we propose that the motivation to cooperate (or not), generated by the reward system in the brain (extending from the striatum to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex), is modulated by two neural networks: a cognitive control system (centered on the lateral prefrontal cortex) that processes extrinsic cooperative incentives, and/or a social cognition system (including the temporo-parietal junction, the medial prefrontal cortex and the amygdala) that processes trust and/or threat signals. The independent modulatory influence of incentives and trust on the decision to cooperate is substantiated by a growing body of neuroimaging data and reconciles the apparent paradox between economic versus social rationality in the literature, suggesting that we are in fact wired for both. Furthermore, the theoretical framework can account for substantial behavioral heterogeneity in prosocial behavior. Based on the existing data, we postulate that self-regarding individuals (who are more likely to adopt an economically rational strategy) are more responsive to extrinsic cooperative incentives and therefore rely relatively more on cognitive control to make (un)cooperative decisions, whereas other-regarding individuals (who are more likely to adopt a socially rational strategy) are more sensitive to trust signals to avoid betrayal and recruit relatively more brain activity in the social cognition system. Several additional hypotheses with respect to the neural roots of social preferences are derived from the model and suggested for future research.