Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Kambou, Donkora
• Xanthoulis, Dimitri
• Ouattara, Korodjouma
• Degre, Aurore

Titel

Non-English title

Ist Teil von

• Biotechnologie, agronomie, société et environnement, 2014-01, Vol.18 (1), p.108-108

Erscheinungsjahr

2014

Quelle

EZB Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Water efficiency and productivity indicators are used in many scientific disciplines, usually to account for water losses that occur during its use, or products generated per unit of water consumed. The interpretation of these indicators is very diverse in the literature. However, the majority of definitions consider water efficiency as a measure of the effectiveness of irrigation, and view water productivity as a measure of the effectiveness of the physiological processes of both biomass production and crop yield formation, linked to the actual consumption of water by the crops. Thus, the consensus seems to be for water application efficiency (Ea) to be considered as the ratio of actual evapotranspiration to the water applied and productivity as the ratio of yield to actual evapotranspiration. The point of divergence relates fundamentally to the understanding of the constituent expressions of productivity (PE, product/"water consumed") and efficiency of water application (Ea, "water consumed"/"applied water"). Indeed, the term "water consumed" is referred to variously by several authors as "actual evapotranspiration", "gross irrigation plus rainfall", "evapotranspiration plus water lost at the plot but beneficial to other users", etc. Furthermore, while providing more details on the concepts of efficiency and water productivity, this review shows that the factors affecting these indicators have not yet been sufficiently elucidated. Thus, one of the axes of investigation could be to model the application efficiency of water firstly, according to water management practices and secondly, in terms of productivity levels in relation to the crop establishment period.