Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2014-02, Vol.29 (2), p.77-81
Ort / Verlag
Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
•Some conservation biologists are claiming that contemporary conservation has failed.•However, these critiques and their suggested remedies are not supported by data.•Ethical assumptions, not scientific data, underlie these proposed shifts in the practice of conservation.
In recent years, some conservation biologists and conservation organizations have sought to refocus the field of conservation biology by de-emphasizing the goal of protecting nature for its own sake in favor of protecting the environment for its benefits to humans. This ‘new conservation science’ (NCS) has inspired debate among academics and conservationists and motivated fundamental changes in the world's largest conservation groups. Despite claims that NCS approaches are supported by biological and social science, NCS has limited support from either. Rather, the shift in motivations and goals associated with NCS appear to arise largely from a belief system holding that the needs and wants of humans should be prioritized over any intrinsic or inherent rights and values of nature.