Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 1 von 1

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
The effects of two therapeutic patellofemoral taping techniques on strength, endurance, and pain responses
Ist Teil von
  • Physical therapy in sport, 2013-11, Vol.14 (4), p.199-206
Ort / Verlag
England: Elsevier Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2013
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Abstract Objective To compare the effects of taping techniques on clinical measures in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) patients. Design Crossover experimental design. Setting Controlled laboratory. Participants Twenty physically active PFPS patients. Main outcome measures Isokinetic strength and endurance, and perceived pain. Results Bilateral baseline differences existed for strength (involved = 1.8 ± 0.5 Nm/kg; uninvolved = 2.1 ± 0.5 Nm/kg; p  = 0.001) and endurance (involved = 35.6 ± 14.0 J/kg; uninvolved = 40.2 ± 12.9 J/kg; p  = 0.013). Strength (McConnell = 2.1 ± 0.6 Nm/kg, 95% SCI = (1.1, 4.2); Spider®  = 2.1 ± 0.5 Nm/kg, 95% SCI = (0.9, 4.0)) and endurance (McConnell = 42.9 ± 13.8 J/kg, 95% SCI = (2.9, 11.6); Spider®  = 42.5 ± 11.0 J/kg, 95% SCI = (2.6, −11.3)) increased when taped compared to baseline. Pain decreased during strength (baseline = 3.0 ± 2.2 cm; McConnell = 1.9 ± 1.7 cm, 95% SCI = (−1.8, −0.4); Spider®  = 1.6 ± 2.0 cm, 95% SCI = (−2.0, −0.5)) and endurance (baseline = 2.5 ± 2.0 cm; McConnell = 1.5 ± 1.8 cm, 95% SCI = (−1.6, −0.4); Spider®  = 1.1 ± 0.8 cm, 95% SCI = (−1.7, −0.5)) measurements when taped. Differences between taping techniques were insignificant. Conclusions Taping improved clinical measures in PFPS patients. No differences existed between Spider® and McConnell techniques.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX