Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Comparison of the use of the Valsalva maneuver and the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA®) to relieve venipuncture pain: a randomized controlled trial
Ist Teil von
Journal of anesthesia, 2013-06, Vol.27 (3), p.407-411
Ort / Verlag
Japan: Springer Japan
Erscheinungsjahr
2013
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Purpose
Intravenous cannulation is a painful and stressful procedure. The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA
®
) with that of the Valsalva maneuver in adult patients during i.v. cannulation.
Methods
One hundred ninety-five patients were randomized prospectively to three groups. The dorsum of the nondominant hand was covered with a thick paste of 2.5 g of EMLA
®
cream in the EMLA
®
group (group E) and left for a minimum of 30 min before venipuncture. In the control group (group C), the same procedure was applied except that Vaseline
®
was used instead of the EMLA
®
. The Valsalva group (group V) were punctured during a Valsalva maneuver. The patients were placed in the supine position during venipuncture. The patients then scored the amount of pain on cannulation using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = extreme pain).
Results
Thirteen patients were excluded from the analysis due to failed cannulation. There was no difference in the demographic profiles of the groups (
p
> 0.05). The success of VP was significantly higher in group V than in groups E and C (
p
< 0.001). The median pain score as assessed by the NRS after venipuncture in group C was 3 (range 0–9), whereas the median pain values in groups E and V were 2 (range 0–7) and 2 (range 1–8).
Conclusions
The Valsalva maneuver yields similar results to the EMLA
®
in terms of pain reduction during venipuncture.