Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Wee, J.S.
• Petrof, G.
• Jackson, K.
• Barker, J.N.W.N.
• Smith, C.H.

Titel

Infliximab for the treatment of psoriasis in the U.K.: 9 years' experience of infusion reactions at a single centre

Ist Teil von

• British journal of dermatology (1951), 2012-08, Vol.167 (2), p.411-416

Ort / Verlag

Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2012

Quelle

Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Summary Background  Infliximab is an antitumour necrosis factor‐α chimeric monoclonal antibody that is an established treatment for severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The recommended administration of a 2‐h infusion followed by 2 h of monitoring is practised due to the potential occurrence of infusion reactions. However, accelerated infusions and shortened monitoring periods are used in patients with rheumatological disorders and inflammatory bowel disease without an increase in adverse events. Objectives  To review the standard infliximab infusion protocol, the incidence of acute infusion reactions, the use of concomitant methotrexate and the clinical relevance of the 2‐h postinfusion monitoring period. Methods  A retrospective case note and pharmacy database review of all infliximab infusions administered to patients with psoriasis at a tertiary dermatology centre was carried out. Results  Fifty‐nine consecutive patients received a total of 858 infliximab infusions (range 1–43 infusions per patient) between January 2001 and June 2010. The incidence of infusion reactions was 1·5%, affecting 16·9% of patients and occurring between the first and eleventh infusions. Mild, moderate and severe acute reactions occurred in 0·6% (n = 5), 0·3% (n = 3) and 0·3% (n = 3) of infliximab infusions, respectively. Thirty‐three patients (56%) received concomitant systemic treatments during part of or throughout the infliximab treatment, including 24 (41%) on methotrexate (5–20 mg weekly). The prevalence of infusion reactions in patients receiving infliximab alone was 27% compared with 4% in those receiving concomitant methotrexate (P = 0·05). All infusion reactions were managed as per our trust protocol with only one infusion reaction occurring in the postinfusion period (10 min after infusion completion). Conclusion  The risk of infusion reactions in our cohort of patients was low, with the majority occurring early in the treatment cycle. Concomitant methotrexate may reduce this risk. A shortened postinfusion monitoring period can be safely considered.