Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 6 von 49
Journal of experimental social psychology, 2012-07, Vol.48 (4), p.855-866
2012

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective-giving’ in the context of intergroup conflict
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of experimental social psychology, 2012-07, Vol.48 (4), p.855-866
Ort / Verlag
San Diego: Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2012
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Although hundreds of dialogue programs geared towards conflict resolution are offered every year, there have been few scientific studies of their effectiveness. Across 2 studies we examined the effect of controlled, dyadic interactions on attitudes towards the ‘other’ in members of groups involved in ideological conflict. Study 1 involved Mexican immigrants and White Americans in Arizona, and Study 2 involved Israelis and Palestinians in the Middle East. Cross-group dyads interacted via video and text in a brief, structured, face-to-face exchange: one person was assigned to write about the difficulties of life in their society (‘perspective-giving’), and the second person was assigned to accurately summarize the statement of the first person (‘perspective-taking’). Positive changes in attitudes towards the outgroup were greater for Mexican immigrants and Palestinians after perspective-giving and for White Americans and Israelis after perspective-taking. For Palestinians, perspective-giving to an Israeli effectively changed attitudes towards Israelis, while a control condition in which they wrote an essay on the same topic without interacting had no effect on attitudes, illustrating the critical role of being heard. Thus, the effects of dialogue for conflict resolution depend on an interaction between dialogue condition and participants' group membership, which may reflect power asymmetries. ► Attitude change in White Americans and Mexican immigrants, Israelis and Palestinians. ► Effectiveness of brief, internet-based interaction depends upon group membership. ► Perspective-taking is most effective for members of dominant groups. ► ‘Perspective-giving’ is most effective for members of non-dominant groups. ► For Palestinians, ‘being heard’ is key to the effectiveness of perspective-giving.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX