Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Kasischke, Eric S.
• Loboda, Tatiana
• Giglio, Louis
• French, Nancy H. F.
• Hoy, E. E.
• de Jong, Bernardus
• Riano, David

Titel

Quantifying burned area for North American forests: Implications for direct reduction of carbon stocks

Ist Teil von

• Journal of Geophysical Research, 2011-12, Vol.116 (G4), p.n/a, Article G04003

Ort / Verlag

Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2011

Quelle

Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• A synthesis was carried out to analyze information available to quantify fire activity and burned area across North America, including a comparison of different data sources and an assessment of how variations in burned area estimate impact carbon emissions from fires. Data sets maintained by fire management agencies provide the longest record of burned area information. Canada and Alaska have the most well developed data sets consisting of the perimeters of large fires (>200 ha) going back to 1959 and 1950, respectively. A similar data set back to 1980 exists for the Conterminous U.S., but contains data only from federal land management agencies. During the early half of the 20th century, average burned area across North America ranged between 10 and 20 × 106 ha yr−1, largely because of frequent surface fires in the southeastern U.S. Over the past two decades, an average of 5 × 106 ha yr−1 has burned. Moderate‐resolution (500–1000 m) satellite burned area products information products appear to either underestimate burned area (GFED3 and MCD45A1) or significantly overestimate burned area (L3JRC and GLOBCARBON). Of all the satellite data products, the GFED3 data set provides the most consistent source of burned area when compared to fire management data. Because they do not suitably reflect actual fire activity, the L3JRC and GLOBCARBON burned area data sets are not suitable for use in carbon cycle studies in North America. The MCD45A1 data set appears to map a higher fraction of burned area in low biomass areas compared to the GFED3 data set. Key Points A variety of different burned area products exist for North America Land manage records provide the best source of long term data Considerable uncertainties exist for historical burned area estimates