Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 18 von 407

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Why didn't you tag me?!: Social exclusion from Instagram posts hurts, especially those with a high need to belong
Ist Teil von
  • Computers in human behavior, 2022-02, Vol.127, p.107062, Article 107062
Ort / Verlag
Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Humans are highly sensitive to ostracism experiences and thus, even very short occurrences of being excluded and ignored can threaten fundamental needs and lower mood. We investigated whether not being tagged causes similar negative responses as being excluded in real life. Using a multi-method approach, we show across five studies (total N = 1149) that not being tagged in a posted photo strongly threatens fundamental needs. This effect is moderated by individuals’ need to belong, such that individuals with a higher need to belong experience not being tagged as more aversive. Results replicate across vignette studies in which participants imagine not being tagged on Instagram (Studies 2 and 3) and across studies using an alleged group task paradigm that mimicked the psychological mechanism of not being tagged outside of Instagram (Studies 4a and 4b). All experimental studies were pre-registered and we freely share all materials, code and data. Extending ostracism effects to the social media phenomenon tagging, the present research bridges real-world and digital social interactions. The results add to theoretical knowledge on social media, ostracism, and digital well-being and have practical implications for social media app design, social media interventions and our everyday interactions that increasingly happen online. •We investigate not being tagged as a novel form of ostracism on social media platforms (e.g., Instagram).•Five studies (total N = 1149) show that not being tagged threatens fundamental needs.•The aversive effects of not being tagged are stronger for individuals with a higher (vs. lower) need to belong.•Findings from observational and vignette studies are solidified by experimental manipulations of (not) being tagged.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0747-5632
eISSN: 1873-7692
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107062
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_journals_2621888775

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX