Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Questions
We investigated the transfer of seeds from species‐rich grassland using green hay and seed material from on‐site threshing to answer the following questions: do these two methods differ in terms of restoration success; and how do the two methods behave in their long‐term effect concerning species composition and species presence?
Location
Styria, Austria.
Methods
We harvested seed material of a species‐rich Arrhenatherion meadow by green hay and on‐site threshing and transferred it to a receptor site. Transferable species were identified by vegetation survey and seed sample analyses. We analysed transfer rates and vegetation cover for the donor site species pool and Arrhenatherion target species, covering a 10‐year observation period. Species composition and presence were derived from plant surveys.
Results
The restoration success of both methods was similar within the observation period. Although donor site species declined, the establishment of target species was satisfactory and species‐rich grassland was successfully established, despite different site conditions between donor and receptor sites and strong dynamics in species composition over time.
Conclusions
Both harvesting methods are well suited for restoring species‐rich grassland, and the actual choice ultimately depends on the costs and the given circumstances. Even if donor and receptor site differ in their site conditions, species‐rich grassland can be established successfully. The prerequisite for this is that: (a) a high proportion of transferred species is able to establish; and (b) specific restoration goals do not exclude vegetation development according to specific receptor site conditions.
We compared the long‐term restoration success and vegetation development of species‐rich grassland, transferred by using green hay and on‐site threshing. There were no significant differences between the two transfer methods, but the vegetation changed significantly over the years. Although donor and receptor site showed different site conditions, both transfer methods enabled successful establishment of species‐rich grassland.