Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 23 von 33
Journal of legal pluralism and unofficial law, 2020-10, Vol.52 (3), p.276-307
2020

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Just-ish? An analysis of routes to justice in family law disputes in England and Wales
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of legal pluralism and unofficial law, 2020-10, Vol.52 (3), p.276-307
Ort / Verlag
Abingdon: Routledge
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Taylor & Francis
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • It is widely documented that the formal family justice system in England and Wales is in crisis. The family courts are plagued by delays and backlogs, whilst parties struggle to secure access to advice and representation due to cuts to public funding. Increasingly, litigants face economic, physical and cultural barriers to courts brought about by rising court fees, reforms to the court system and demographic changes which have resulted in diverse family forms for whom the family courts may have little legitimacy. The first part of this article examines how recent changes to family law and policy in England and Wales have reduced the ease with which parties are able to achieve procedural and substantive justice through the family courts. The second part of the article analyses how forums of dispute resolution which are delivered by non-state actors, but which rely on the state for their authority, have evolved to fill this justice gap and are therefore indicative of a move towards 'weak' legal pluralism in the context of family justice. It is argued that although the family courts are still an important cornerstone of the justice landscape, alternative forums of dispute resolution increasingly play a positive role in enabling disputants to achieve their procedural and substantive goals and this is strengthened by a weak approach to legal pluralism which upholds the autonomy of the parties whilst also ensuring necessary protections and safeguards for vulnerable litigants. The article therefore challenges critics of weak pluralism, who perceive that reliance on state recognition precludes institutions playing an important role outside of the state hierarchy.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0732-9113
eISSN: 2305-9931
DOI: 10.1080/07329113.2020.1835220
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_journals_2560100927

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX