UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist
gegebenenfalls
nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Suche
Details
Zur Ergebnisliste
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
Effects of chlorantraniliprole residual on Helicoverpa zea in Bt and non‐Bt cotton
Pest management science, 2021-05, Vol.77 (5), p.2367-2374
Babu, Arun
Reisig, Dominic D
Pes, Maiquel P
Ranger, Christopher M
Chamkasem, Narong
Reding, Michael E
2021
Volltextzugriff (PDF)
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Babu, Arun
Reisig, Dominic D
Pes, Maiquel P
Ranger, Christopher M
Chamkasem, Narong
Reding, Michael E
Titel
Effects of chlorantraniliprole residual on Helicoverpa zea in Bt and non‐Bt cotton
Ist Teil von
Pest management science, 2021-05, Vol.77 (5), p.2367-2374
Ort / Verlag
Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Quelle
Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
BACKGROUND Helicoverpa zea is managed with foliar applications of chlorantraniliprole in cotton varieties that do not express the Vip3Aa19 toxin in the US Cotton Belt. Foliar insecticides and Bt could interact to influence larval susceptibility. Therefore, it has been suggested that chlorantraniliprole can be used as a tool for Bt resistance management. We designed field and laboratory studies to test the hypothesis that the interaction of Bt toxin and chlorantraniliprole application would result in lower H. zea larval survival when compared to the individual effect of Bt or chlorantraniliprole alone. We also tested for these interactions over time, since chlorantraniliprole residual has not been studied in cotton. RESULTS Results from two field experiments and two laboratory experiments were similar. We found no interactions with Bt and chlorantraniliprole using data not corrected for natural mortality in untreated plots, indicating that these factors did not interact to influence survival. Moreover, we found that Bt and chlorantraniliprole did not interact to influence larval weight and instar. Chlorantraniliprole had lethal and sublethal effects on H. zea larval growth parameters feeding on cotton leaves up to 22 days after application, the final time period that we tested. Finally, concentration of chlorantraniliprole in the leaf was associated with larval survival for the duration of this study, but not larval growth or instar. CONCLUSION Our findings complement the recommendation to use chlorantraniliprole for managing H. zea in cotton, given its long‐residual effects. However, the utility of chlorantraniliprole as a Bt‐resistance management tool for H. zea remains unclear. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry Is there an interaction of Bt and chlorantraniliprole in cotton that impacts Helicoverpa zea larval survival and growth? Our study found little evidence to support this.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1526-498X
eISSN: 1526-4998
DOI: 10.1002/ps.6263
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_journals_2509527102
Format
–
Schlagworte
Animals
,
Bacillus thuringiensis
,
Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics
,
Bacterial Proteins - genetics
,
Cotton
,
Cry1Ac
,
Cry1F
,
Endotoxins
,
Field tests
,
Foliar applications
,
Gossypium - genetics
,
Helicoverpa zea
,
Hemolysin Proteins - genetics
,
Insecticide resistance
,
Insecticides
,
Laboratories
,
Larva
,
Larval development
,
Moths - genetics
,
ortho-Aminobenzoates
,
Plants, Genetically Modified
,
Residual effects
,
Sublethal effects
,
Survival
,
Toxins
,
Zea mays - genetics
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX