Architectural design, 2020-11, Vol.90 (6), p.118-127
2020
Volltextzugriff (PDF)
Details
- Autor(en) / Beteiligte
- Titel
- Wicked Neuroarchitecture: Reciprocity, Shapeshifting Problems and a Case for Embodied Knowledge
- Ist Teil von
- Architectural design, 2020-11, Vol.90 (6), p.118-127
- Ort / Verlag
- Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Erscheinungsjahr
- 2020
- Quelle
- Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
- Beschreibungen/Notizen
- Wicked problems are difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, changing or even contradictory conditions. Both architecture and neuroscience work on wicked problems as a matter of course. The utilisation of evidence‐based design by some neuroarchitecture researchers implies that architecture is subservient to neuroscience, simply a matter of designing brain impulses. Fiona Zisch, lecturer in architecture and a neuroarchitecture researcher based in London and Innsbruck, suggests otherwise.
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Identifikatoren
- ISSN: 0003-8504eISSN: 1554-2769DOI: 10.1002/ad.2640Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_journals_2456381102
- Format
- –
- Schlagworte
- (Un)Balance, Amir‐Homayoun Javadi, Architecture, Bartlett School of Architecture, Christine Wurth, Contracted Time and Expanded Space: The Impact of Circumnavigation on Judgements of Space and Time, Doppelkopf Neuroarchitecture: A Wicked Threshold Space, Elyne Legarnisson, Embodiment, ETH Zurich, German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Hippocampal and Prefrontal Processing of Network Topology to Simulate the Future, Hugo J Spiers, Human body, Interactive Architecture Lab, Iva K Brunec, NeoTouch, Neurosciences, Reciprocity, Sir John Soane's Museum, Talkspace project, University College London, University of Bahrain, University of Hertfordshire, University of Kent