Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 14 von 31

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
842-P: Analysis of Primary Care Provider (PCP) EHR Notes for Discussions of Prediabetes Using Natural Language Processing (NLP) Methods
Ist Teil von
  • Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2020-06, Vol.69 (Supplement_1)
Ort / Verlag
New York: American Diabetes Association
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Background: Prior studies using structured EHR data suggest that patients with prediabetes are not receiving evidence-based care, but prediabetes may be discussed in unstructured data. We developed and validated an NLP tool to identify discussions about prediabetes in EHR notes. Methods: We included adult patients without diabetes with an in-person office visit at any general medicine clinic at a single academic center and at least one HbA1c 5.7-6.4% between 7/1/2016 and 12/31/2018. In phase 1, we devised an initial keyword search strategy based on clinical experience. We extracted notes with at least one of the keywords and manually annotated them to determine whether they represented clinical discussions of prediabetes. We used the annotated notes to train and evaluate multiple machine learning and deep learning classifiers to replicate human annotation. In phase 2, we applied a similar annotation process and machine learning method on notes from a different group of clinic practices. We analyzed notes from phase 2 to describe the content of prediabetes discussions: labs ordered or reviewed (HbA1c or fasting glucose); lifestyle counseling; diabetes prevention program (DPP) discussion/referral; nutrition referral/discussion; and metformin discussion or ordering/continuation. Results: We identified 269 patients with prediabetes discussions in phase 2. Most commonly, PCPs provided lifestyle counseling (80%), reviewed current labs (63%) and ordered follow-up labs (60%). PCPs rarely discussed/referred to a nutritionist (4%). We did not find any discussions/referrals to a DPP. Metformin was discussed, ordered or continued in <2% of patients. Conclusions: We developed and validated a NLP tool that identifies clinical discussions about prediabetes in the EHR. PCPs most commonly provided lifestyle counseling in the office and infrequently placed referrals to nutrition or DPPs, which have strong evidence for preventing progression to diabetes. Disclosure E. Tseng: None. J.L. Schwartz: None. M. Rouhizadeh: None. N.M. Maruthur: Other Relationship; Self; Johns Hopkins HealthCare Solutions. Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1K23DK118205-01A1)
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0012-1797
eISSN: 1939-327X
DOI: 10.2337/db20-842-P
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_journals_2419452803

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX