Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Bailey, R. L.
• Möstl, C.
• Reiss, M. A.
• Weiss, A. J.
• Amerstorfer, U. V.
• Amerstorfer, T.
• Hinterreiter, J.
• Magnes, W.
• Leonhardt, R.

Titel

Prediction of Dst During Solar Minimum Using In Situ Measurements at L5

Ist Teil von

• Space Weather, 2020-05, Vol.18 (5), p.n/a

Ort / Verlag

Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Quelle

Access via Wiley Online Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Geomagnetic storms resulting from high‐speed streams can have significant negative impacts on modern infrastructure due to complex interactions between the solar wind and geomagnetic field. One measure of the extent of this effect is the Kyoto Dst index. We present a method to predict Dst from data measured at the Lagrange 5 (L5) point, which allows for forecasts of solar wind development 4.5 days in advance of the stream reaching the Earth. Using the STEREO‐B satellite as a proxy, we map data measured near L5 to the near‐Earth environment and make a prediction of the Dst from this point using the Temerin‐Li Dst model enhanced from the original using a machine learning approach. We evaluate the method accuracy with both traditional point‐to‐point error measures and an event‐based validation approach. The results show that predictions using L5 data outperform a 27‐day solar wind persistence model in all validation measures but do not achieve a level similar to an L1 monitor. Offsets in timing and the rapidly changing development of Bz in comparison to Bx and By reduce the accuracy. Predictions of Dst from L5 have a root‐mean‐square error of 9 nT, which is double the error of 4 nT using measurements conducted near the Earth. The most useful application of L5 measurements is shown to be in predicting the minimum Dst for the next 4 days. This method is being implemented in a real‐time forecast setting using STEREO‐A as an L5 proxy and has implications for the usefulness of future L5 missions. Key Points In situ L5 data can be used for Dst forecasts at Earth and perform better than 27‐day persistence Low consistency ofBz over multiple days limits the accuracy of Dst predicted from L5 This method performs best when forecasting the minimum Dst during SIRs