Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Erdem, Suna
• Troxler, Esther
• Warschkow, René
• Tsai, Catherine
• Yerokun, Babatunde
• Schmied, Bruno
• Stettler, Christoph
• Blazer, Dan G.
• Hartwig, Matthew
• Worni, Mathias
• Gloor, Beat

Titel

Is There a Role for Surgery in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Esophagus? A Contemporary View from the NCDB

Ist Teil von

• Annals of surgical oncology, 2020-03, Vol.27 (3), p.671-680

Ort / Verlag

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Esophageal neuroendocrine tumors (eNETs) are exceedingly rare, aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Treatment guidelines are ill-defined and mainly based on evidence from case reports and analogous experiences drawn from similar disease sites. Methods The NCDB was reviewed for histologically confirmed stage I–III, primary eNETs from 2006 to 2014. Patients were grouped into whether or not they underwent primary tumor resection. Univariate, multivariable, and full bipartite propensity score (PS) adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall and relative survival differences. Results A total of 250 patients were identified. Mean age was 65.0 (standard deviation [SD] 11.9) years, and 174 (69.6%) patients were male. Most patients had stage III disease ( n  = 136, 54.4%), and the most common type of NET was small cell eNET ( n  = 111, 44.4%). Chemotherapy was used in 186 (74.4%), radiation therapy in 178 (71.2%), and oncological resection was performed in 69 (27.6%) patients. Crude 2-year survival rates were higher in the operated (57.3%) compared with the nonoperated group (35.2%; p  < 0.001). The survival benefit held true after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.69, p  < 0.001). After full bipartite PS adjustment analysis, survival was longer for patients who received a surgical resection compared with those who did not (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31–0.75, p  = 0.003) with a corresponding 2-year overall survival rate of 63.3% (95% CI 52.0–77.2) versus 38.8% (95% CI 30.9–48.8), respectively. Conclusions Multimodal treatment that includes surgery is associated with better overall survival for eNETs. Additional research is needed to more definitively identify patients who benefit from esophagectomy and to establish an appropriate treatment algorithm.