Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 16 von 303

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Bombing for Biodiversity in the United States: Response to Zentelis & Lindenmayer 2015
Ist Teil von
  • Conservation letters, 2015-07, Vol.8 (4), p.306-307
Ort / Verlag
Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Here, we offer an empirical evaluation of their statements regarding size, distribution, and representation of ecological systems (i.e., vegetation communities) within MTAs for the contiguous United States (CONUS) by comparing MTAs with lands managed by other U.S. federal agencies. By combining the Protected Areas Database of the U.S. (PAD‐US; USGS‐GAP ) and the National GAP Land Cover (USGS‐GAP ), we determined total number of ecological systems across all units of DoD and other agencies; and proportion of each ecological system that each agency represents across all lands. [...]U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands, despite being 8.5 and 8.6 times larger than DoD lands, represent only 458 and 293 ecosystems, respectively. [...]even though DoD lands comprise only 5% of the total area of federal lands, they represent 82.6% of the diversity of ecological systems, whereas USFS and BLM comprise 42% and 43% of the total federal land area, but neither represents as much diversity as DoD lands.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1755-263X
eISSN: 1755-263X
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12197
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_journals_2289693630

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX