Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 4 von 83
Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), 2017-04, Vol.106 (2), p.273-298
2017
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Creating an Instrument to Measure Student Response to Instructional Practices
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), 2017-04, Vol.106 (2), p.273-298
Ort / Verlag
Washington: Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Quelle
Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Background Calls for the reform of education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) have inspired many instructional innovations, some research based. Yet adoption of such instruction has been slow. Research has suggested that students' response may significantly affect an instructor's willingness to adopt different types of instruction. Purpose We created the Student Response to Instructional Practices (StRIP) instrument to measure the effects of several variables on student response to instructional practices. We discuss the step‐by‐step process for creating this instrument. Design/Method The development process had six steps: item generation and construct development, validity testing, implementation, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and instrument modification and replication. We discuss pilot testing of the initial instrument, construct development, and validation using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results This process produced 47 items measuring three parts of our framework. Types of instruction separated into four factors (interactive, constructive, active, and passive); strategies for using in‐class activities into two factors (explanation and facilitation); and student responses to instruction into five factors (value, positivity, participation, distraction, and evaluation). Conclusions We describe the design process and final results for our instrument, a useful tool for understanding the relationship between type of instruction and students' response.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX