Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Genestreti, K. J.
• Nakamura, T. K. M.
• Nakamura, R.
• Denton, R. E.
• Torbert, R. B.
• Burch, J. L.
• Plaschke, F.
• Fuselier, S. A.
• Ergun, R. E.
• Giles, B. L.
• Russell, C. T.

Titel

How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate EM for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?

Ist Teil von

• Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2018-11, Vol.123 (11), p.9130-9149

Ort / Verlag

Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2018

Quelle

Wiley-Blackwell Journals

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field EM can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and focus on the very large errors in EM that result from errors in an LMN boundary normal coordinate system. We determine several LMN coordinates for this MMS event using several different methods. We use these M axes to estimate EM. We find some consensus that the reconnection rate was roughly EM = 3.2 ± 0.6 mV/m, which corresponds to a normalized reconnection rate of 0.18 ± 0.035. Minimum variance analysis of the electron velocity (MVA‐ve), MVA of E, minimization of Faraday residue, and an adjusted version of the maximum directional derivative of the magnetic field (MDD‐B) technique all produce reasonably similar coordinate axes. We use virtual MMS data from a particle‐in‐cell simulation of this event to estimate the errors in the coordinate axes and reconnection rate associated with MVA‐ve and MDD‐B. The L and M directions are most reliably determined by MVA‐ve when the spacecraft observes a clear electron jet reversal. When the magnetic field data have errors as small as 0.5% of the background field strength, the M direction obtained by MDD‐B technique may be off by as much as 35°. The normal direction is most accurately obtained by MDD‐B. Overall, we find that these techniques were able to identify EM from the virtual data within error bars ≥20%. Key Points The reconnection rate EM is estimated for one event using several techniques to find an M direction The error bars in EM and the LMN coordinate directions are estimated from virtual data The reconnection rate is likely EM = 3.2 mV/m ± 0.6 mV/m, which corresponds to a normalized rate of 0.18 ± 0.035