Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 5 von 3585

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Efficacy and Toxicity of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2018-01, Vol.119 (1), p.511-523
Ort / Verlag
United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2018
Quelle
Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • ABSTRACT Objective A network meta‐analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and toxicity of different chemotherapy regimens in treating advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2016 were searched. A combination of direct and indirect evidences was referred to for calculating the weighted mean difference (WMD) or the odds ratio (OR) and to establish surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves, so as to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of different chemotherapy regimens in treating advanced or metastatic PC. Twenty randomized controlled trials were enrolled. Twelve chemotherapy regimens included Gemcitabine, S‐1 (Tegafur), Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, Gemcitabine + Capecitabine, Gemcitabine + S‐1, Gemcitabine + 5‐FU (5‐fluorouracil), Gemcitabine + Exatecan, Gemcitabine + Irinotecan, Gemcitabine + Nab‐paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX (Oxaliplatin + Irinotecan + Fluorouracil + Leucovorin), Gemcitabine + Oxaliplatin, and Gemcitabine + Pemetrexed. Higher overall response rate (ORR) was observed in patients treated with the gemcitabine + S‐1 and FOLFIRINO regimens. Thrombocytopenia reduced in patients treated with the S‐1 regimen. The Gemcitabine + S‐1 and FOLFIRINO regimens had better short‐ and long‐term efficacies than the other regimens; S‐1 regimen had the lowest hematologic toxicity, while Gemcitabine + Nab‐paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX, and Gemcitabine + Pemetrexed regimens had higher incidence of non‐hematologic toxicity among twelve chemotherapy regimens. The efficacy of Gemcitabine + S‐1 and FOLFIRINOX regimens may be better in treating patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, while FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine + Pemetrexed regimens may have relatively higher incidence of toxicity than other regimens. J. Cell. Biochem. 119: 511–523, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. A network meta‐analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and toxicity of different chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). The results from this study indicate that Gemcitabine + S‐1 and FOLFIRINOX regimens may have better efficacy for treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, while FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine + Pemetrexed regimens may have relatively higher incidence of toxicity than other regimens.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX