Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 7 von 3355
Allergy (Copenhagen), 2017-07, Vol.72 (7), p.1105-1113
2017
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Evidence for a role of eosinophils in blister formation in bullous pemphigoid
Ist Teil von
  • Allergy (Copenhagen), 2017-07, Vol.72 (7), p.1105-1113
Ort / Verlag
Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Quelle
Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Background Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune bullous disease of the skin characterized by subepidermal blister formation due to tissue‐bound and circulating autoantibodies to the hemidesmosomal antigens BP180 and BP230. Although eosinophils and their toxic mediators are found abundantly in BP lesions, their role in blister formation has remained unclear. Objective To investigate the role of eosinophils in the pathogenesis of BP with a specific focus on blister formation and to define conditions inducing dermal–epidermal separation (DES). Methods In an ex vivo human model of BP, normal human skin cryosections were incubated with purified human peripheral blood eosinophils with or without activation in the presence or absence of BP autoantibodies, brefeldin A, diphenyleneiodonium, DNase or blocking F(ab′)2 fragments to CD16, CD18, CD32 and CD64. Dermal–epidermal separation was assessed by light microscopy studies and quantified using Fiji software. Results Following activation with IL‐5 and in the presence of BP autoantibodies, eosinophils induced separation along the dermal–epidermal junction of ex vivo skin. Dermal–epidermal separation was significantly reduced by blocking any of the following: Fcγ receptor binding (P = 0.048), eosinophil adhesion (P = 0.046), reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (P = 0.002), degranulation (P < 0.0001) or eosinophil extracellular trap (EET) formation (P = 0.048). Conclusions Our results provide evidence that IL‐5‐activated eosinophils directly contribute to BP blister formation in the presence of BP autoantibodies. Dermal–epidermal separation by IL‐5‐activated eosinophils depends on adhesion and Fcγ receptor activation, requires elevated ROS production and degranulation and involves EET formation. Thus, targeting eosinophils may be a promising therapeutic approach for BP.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX