Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Gottfried, Emily D.
• Schenk, Allison M.
• Vitacco, Michael J.

Titel

Retrospectively Assessing for Feigning in Criminal Responsibility Evaluations: Recommendations for Clinical Practice

Ist Teil von

• Journal of forensic psychology practice, 2016-03, Vol.16 (2), p.118-128

Ort / Verlag

Abingdon: Routledge

Erscheinungsjahr

2016

Quelle

Taylor & Francis

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Evaluating for feigning, the intentional production or misrepresentation of psychological symptoms or cognitive impairments, is an essential component of every forensic evaluation (Rogers, Jackson, Salekin, & Neumann, 2003). One strategy of feigning that has largely been overlooked in the field of forensic psychology and psychiatry is retrospectively feigning symptoms in the context of criminal responsibility evaluations. Specifically, this involves a defendant who is not currently feigning symptoms, but is reporting experiencing a number of symptoms of mental illness at the time of the crime. Although there are numerous measures designed to detect current feigned psychological symptoms or cognitive impairments, little research has been devoted to the proper evaluation of retrospective feigning. Because this concept has been overlooked and underresearched, this paper offers suggestions and best-practice guidelines for evaluating retrospective feigning in the context of criminal responsibility evaluations.