Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Isaac Reed begins his book with the claim that 'understanding of social knowledge is due for a massive transformation'. Sociologicky Casopis recognizes Interpretation and Social Knowledge as a genuine and highly readable contribution to such a transformation. The book is ambitious, yet concise, complex but not overwhelming. However, the pertinent discussion closely resembles the Methodenstreit, the foundational debate about the epistemic footing of the then emerging social sciences, which revolved around the pivotal binary of nomothetic science (Naturwissenschaften) and idiographic humanities (Geisteswissenschaften). Reed indicates a 'dialectical' way out of the seemingly inescapable either/or dilemma of causal explanation vs hermeneutic interpretation. He clarifies how interpretation may count. as explanation in a post-positivist era. It is this basic and in their view legitimate intention that directly evokes Weber's definition of sociology as 'a science concerning itself with the interpretive understanding of social action and thereby with a causal explanation of its course and consequences'.