Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 6 von 37

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Comparing the Explanatory Capacity of Three Constructs in the Prediction of Engineers' Proficiency, Adaptivity, and Proactivity
Ist Teil von
  • Human resource management, 2015-07, Vol.54 (4), p.689-709
Ort / Verlag
Hoboken, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Quelle
Business Source Ultimate
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Advances in the research of work performance have been due in large part to the conceptualization of performance as a multidimensional construct. Recently, Griffin, Neal, and Parker (2007), have identified three different dimensions of work role performance: proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity. Social effectiveness constructs (i.e., political skill) have been receiving increased attention in research and there have been recent calls for further research in the area. This study compares the explanatory capacity of political skill, professional experience and intrinsic motivation in the prediction of engineers' proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity. The relationships were tested with structural equations analysis of 180 supervisor‐engineer dyad data. Results indicate that the three dimensions of individual work performance are significantly influenced by political skill and professional experience, but not by intrinsic motivation. The results also indicate that political skill is the strongest predictor. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0090-4848
eISSN: 1099-050X
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21639
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_journals_1699516860

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX