Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 3 von 507

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study supports the causal effects of a high basal metabolic rate on colorectal cancer risk
Ist Teil von
  • PloS one, 2022-08, Vol.17 (8), p.e0273452-e0273452
Ort / Verlag
San Francisco: Public Library of Science
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • We conducted a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to determine whether genetically predicted basal metabolic rate (BMR) was a causal risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) or whether a genetically predicted CRC risk can influence the BMR level (i.e., reverse causation). We employed 1,040 genetic variants as proxies for BMR to obtain effect estimates on CRC risk. Another 58 CRC-associated variants were used to estimate effects on BMR levels. Stratified analysis by tumor site was used to examine the causal associations between BMR and colon/rectal cancer risk. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method indicated a significant causal effect of genetically determined BMR on CRC risk (OR.sub.SD = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.07-1.51). No significant reverse causal association was identified between genetically increased CRC risk and BMR levels [IVW ([beta] = 0, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0)]. The results of MR-Egger and the weighted median method were consistent with the IVW method. Stratified analysis by CRC sites identified significant causal associations between BMR and colon cancer [IVW (OR.sub.SD = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.16-1-80)], and null evidence of a causal association between BMR and rectal cancer risk was found (p > 0.05). Our findings add to the current literature by validating a positive relationship between high BMR levels and CRC risk instead of reverse causality. The genetically predicted BMR level was causally associated with colon cancer risk but not rectal cancer risk.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX