Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Markle-Reid, Maureen
• McAiney, Carrie
• Fisher, Kathryn
• Ganann, Rebecca
• Gauthier, Alain P
• Heald-Taylor, Gail
• McElhaney, Janet E
• McMillan, Fran
• Petrie, Penelope
• Ploeg, Jenny
• Urajnik, Diana J
• Whitmore, Carly
• Wong, Samuel Yeung-shan

Titel

Effectiveness of a nurse-led hospital-to-home transitional care intervention for older adults with multimorbidity and depressive symptoms: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Ist Teil von

• PloS one, 2021-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e0254573-e0254573

Ort / Verlag

San Francisco: Public Library of Science

Erscheinungsjahr

2021

Quelle

Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• To evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led hospital-to-home transitional care intervention versus usual care on mental functioning (primary outcome), physical functioning, depressive symptoms, anxiety, perceived social support, patient experience, and health service use costs in older adults with multimorbidity ([greater than or equal to] 2 comorbidities) and depressive symptoms. Pragmatic multi-site randomized controlled trial conducted in three communities in Ontario, Canada. Participants were allocated into two groups of intervention and usual care (control). 127 older adults ([greater than or equal to] 65 years) discharged from hospital to the community with multimorbidity and depressive symptoms. This evidence-based, patient-centred intervention consisted of individually tailored care delivery by a Registered Nurse comprising in-home visits, telephone follow-up and system navigation support over 6-months. The primary outcome was the change in mental functioning, from baseline to 6-months. Secondary outcomes were the change in physical functioning, depressive symptoms, anxiety, perceived social support, patient experience, and health service use cost, from baseline to 6-months. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed using ANCOVA modeling. Of 127 enrolled participants (63-intervention, 64-control), 85% had six or more chronic conditions. 28 participants were lost to follow-up, leaving 99 (47 -intervention, 52-control) participants for the complete case analysis. No significant group differences were seen for the baseline to six-month change in mental functioning or other secondary outcomes. Older adults in the intervention group reported receiving more information about health and social services (p = 0.03) compared with the usual care group. Although no significant group differences were seen for the primary or secondary outcomes, the intervention resulted in improvements in one aspect of patient experience (information about health and social services). The study sample fell below the target sample (enrolled 127, targeted 216), which can account for the non-significant findings. Further research on the impact of the intervention and factors that contribute to the results is recommended.