Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Chapman, Lesley M
• Spies, Noah
• Pai, Patrick
• Lim, Chun Shen
• Carroll, Andrew
• Narzisi, Giuseppe
• Watson, Christopher M
• Proukakis, Christos
• Clarke, Wayne E
• Nariai, Naoki
• Dawson, Eric
• Jones, Garan
• Blankenberg, Daniel
• Brueffer, Christian
• Xiao, Chunlin
• Kolora, Sree Rohit Raj
• Alexander, Noah
• Wolujewicz, Paul
• Ahmed, Azza E
• Smith, Graeme
• Shehreen, Saadlee
• Wenger, Aaron M
• Salit, Marc
• Zook, Justin M
• Ioshikhes, Ilya

Titel

A crowdsourced set of curated structural variants for the human genome

Ist Teil von

• PLoS computational biology, 2020-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e1007933

Ort / Verlag

United States: Public Library of Science

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• A high quality benchmark for small variants encompassing 88 to 90% of the reference genome has been developed for seven Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) reference samples. However a reliable benchmark for large indels and structural variants (SVs) is more challenging. In this study, we manually curated 1235 SVs, which can ultimately be used to evaluate SV callers or train machine learning models. We developed a crowdsourcing app-SVCurator-to help GIAB curators manually review large indels and SVs within the human genome, and report their genotype and size accuracy. SVCurator displays images from short, long, and linked read sequencing data from the GIAB Ashkenazi Jewish Trio son [NIST RM 8391/HG002]. We asked curators to assign labels describing SV type (deletion or insertion), size accuracy, and genotype for 1235 putative insertions and deletions sampled from different size bins between 20 and 892,149 bp. 'Expert' curators were 93% concordant with each other, and 37 of the 61 curators had at least 78% concordance with a set of 'expert' curators. The curators were least concordant for complex SVs and SVs that had inaccurate breakpoints or size predictions. After filtering events with low concordance among curators, we produced high confidence labels for 935 events. The SVCurator crowdsourced labels were 94.5% concordant with the heuristic-based draft benchmark SV callset from GIAB. We found that curators can successfully evaluate putative SVs when given evidence from multiple sequencing technologies.