Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 11 von 327
PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0151048-e0151048
2016
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Evaluating β Diversity as a Surrogate for Species Representation at Fine Scale
Ist Teil von
  • PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e0151048-e0151048
Ort / Verlag
United States: Public Library of Science
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Quelle
Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Species turnover or β diversity is a conceptually attractive surrogate for conservation planning. However, there has been only 1 attempt to determine how well sites selected to maximize β diversity represent species, and that test was done at a scale too coarse (2,500 km2 sites) to inform most conservation decisions. We used 8 plant datasets, 3 bird datasets, and 1 mammal dataset to evaluate whether sites selected to span β diversity will efficiently represent species at finer scale (sites sizes < 1 ha to 625 km2). We used ordinations to characterize dissimilarity in species assemblages (β diversity) among plots (inventory data) or among grid cells (atlas data). We then selected sites to maximize β diversity and used the Species Accumulation Index, SAI, to evaluate how efficiently the surrogate (selecting sites for maximum β diversity) represented species in the same taxon. Across all 12 datasets, sites selected for maximum β diversity represented species with a median efficiency of 24% (i.e., the surrogate was 24% more effective than random selection of sites), and an interquartile range of 4% to 41% efficiency. β diversity was a better surrogate for bird datasets than for plant datasets, and for atlas datasets with 10-km to 14-km grid cells than for atlas datasets with 25-km grid cells. We conclude that β diversity is more than a mere descriptor of how species are distributed on the landscape; in particular β diversity might be useful to maximize the complementarity of a set of sites. Because we tested only within-taxon surrogacy, our results do not prove that β diversity is useful for conservation planning. But our results do justify further investigation to identify the circumstances in which β diversity performs well, and to evaluate it as a cross-taxon surrogate.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1932-6203
eISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151048
Titel-ID: cdi_plos_journals_1770505151

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX