Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Ross-Innes, Caryn S
• Debiram-Beecham, Irene
• O'Donovan, Maria
• Walker, Elaine
• Varghese, Sibu
• Lao-Sirieix, Pierre
• Lovat, Laurence
• Griffin, Michael
• Ragunath, Krish
• Haidry, Rehan
• Sami, Sarmed S
• Kaye, Philip
• Novelli, Marco
• Disep, Babett
• Ostler, Richard
• Aigret, Benoit
• North, Bernard V
• Bhandari, Pradeep
• Haycock, Adam
• Morris, Danielle
• Attwood, Stephen
• Dhar, Anjan
• Rees, Colin
• Rutter, Matthew D D
• Sasieni, Peter D
• Fitzgerald, Rebecca C
• Franco, Eduardo L.

Titel

Evaluation of a minimally invasive cell sampling device coupled with assessment of trefoil factor 3 expression for diagnosing Barrett's esophagus: a multi-center case-control study

Ist Teil von

• PLoS medicine, 2015-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e1001780-e1001780

Ort / Verlag

United States: Public Library of Science

Erscheinungsjahr

2015

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a commonly undiagnosed condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Routine endoscopic screening for BE is not recommended because of the burden this would impose on the health care system. The objective of this study was to determine whether a novel approach using a minimally invasive cell sampling device, the Cytosponge, coupled with immunohistochemical staining for the biomarker Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3), could be used to identify patients who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE. A case-control study was performed across 11 UK hospitals between July 2011 and December 2013. In total, 1,110 individuals comprising 463 controls with dyspepsia and reflux symptoms and 647 BE cases swallowed a Cytosponge prior to endoscopy. The primary outcome measures were to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and accuracy of the Cytosponge-TFF3 test compared with endoscopy and biopsy. In all, 1,042 (93.9%) patients successfully swallowed the Cytosponge, and no serious adverse events were attributed to the device. The Cytosponge was rated favorably, using a visual analogue scale, compared with endoscopy (p < 0.001), and patients who were not sedated for endoscopy were more likely to rate the Cytosponge higher than endoscopy (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.001). The overall sensitivity of the test was 79.9% (95% CI 76.4%-83.0%), increasing to 87.2% (95% CI 83.0%-90.6%) for patients with ≥3 cm of circumferential BE, known to confer a higher cancer risk. The sensitivity increased to 89.7% (95% CI 82.3%-94.8%) in 107 patients who swallowed the device twice during the study course. There was no loss of sensitivity in patients with dysplasia. The specificity for diagnosing BE was 92.4% (95% CI 89.5%-94.7%). The case-control design of the study means that the results are not generalizable to a primary care population. Another limitation is that the acceptability data were limited to a single measure. The Cytosponge-TFF3 test is safe and acceptable, and has accuracy comparable to other screening tests. This test may be a simple and inexpensive approach to identify patients with reflux symptoms who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE.