Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Marcus, Julia L
• Glidden, David V
• Mayer, Kenneth H
• Liu, Albert Y
• Buchbinder, Susan P
• Amico, K Rivet
• McMahan, Vanessa
• Kallas, Esper Georges
• Montoya-Herrera, Orlando
• Pilotto, Jose
• Grant, Robert M
• Stephenson, Rob

Titel

No evidence of sexual risk compensation in the iPrEx trial of daily oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis

Ist Teil von

• PloS one, 2013-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e81997-e81997

Ort / Verlag

United States: Public Library of Science

Erscheinungsjahr

2013

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) reduced HIV acquisition in the iPrEx trial among men who have sex with men and transgender women. Self-reported sexual risk behavior decreased overall, but may be affected by reporting bias. We evaluated potential risk compensation using biomarkers of sexual risk behavior. Sexual practices were assessed at baseline and quarterly thereafter; perceived treatment assignment and PrEP efficacy beliefs were assessed at 12 weeks. Among participants with ≥1 follow-up behavioral assessment, sexual behavior, syphilis, and HIV infection were compared by perceived treatment assignment, actual treatment assignment, and perceived PrEP efficacy. Overall, acute HIV infection and syphilis decreased during follow-up. Compared with participants believing they were receiving placebo, participants believing they were receiving FTC/TDF reported more receptive anal intercourse partners prior to initiating drug (12.8 vs. 7.7, P = 0.04). Belief in receiving FTC/TDF was not associated with an increase in receptive anal intercourse with no condom (ncRAI) from baseline through follow-up (risk ratio [RR] 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-1.4; P = 0.75), nor with a decrease after stopping study drug (RR 0.8, 95% CI: 0.5-1.3; P = 0.46). In the placebo arm, there were trends toward lower HIV incidence among participants believing they were receiving FTC/TDF (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.8, 95% CI: 0.4-1.8; P = 0.26) and also believing it was highly effective (IRR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.1-1.7; P = 0.12). There was no evidence of sexual risk compensation in iPrEx. Participants believing they were receiving FTC/TDF had more partners prior to initiating drug, suggesting that risk behavior was not a consequence of PrEP use.