Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 2 von 371
International journal of remote sensing, 2007-01, Vol.28 (2), p.269-291
2007
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Estimating vegetation cover in an urban environment based on Landsat ETM+ imagery: A case study in Phoenix, USA
Ist Teil von
  • International journal of remote sensing, 2007-01, Vol.28 (2), p.269-291
Ort / Verlag
Abingdon: Taylor & Francis
Erscheinungsjahr
2007
Quelle
Taylor & Francis
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Studies of urban ecological systems can be greatly enhanced by combining ecosystem modelling and remote sensing which often requires establishing statistical relationships between field and remote sensing data. At the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAPLTER) site in the south-western USA, we estimated vegetation abundance from Landsat ETM+ acquired at three dates by computing vegetation indices (NDVI and SAVI) and conducting linear spectral mixture analysis (SMA). Our analyses were stratified by three major land use/land covers-urban, agricultural, and desert. SMA, which provides direct measures of vegetation end member fraction for each pixel, was directly compared with field data and with the independent accuracy assessment dataset constructed from air photos. Vegetation index images with highest correlation with field data were used to construct regression models whose predictions were validated with the accuracy assessment dataset. We also investigated alternative regression methods, recognizing the inadequacy of traditional Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) in biophysical remote sensing. Symmetrical regressions-reduced major axis (RMA) and bisector ordinary least squares (OLS bisector )-were evaluated and compared with OLS. Our results indicated that SMA was a more accurate approach to vegetation quantification in urban and agricultural land uses, but had a poor accuracy when applied to desert vegetation. Potential sources of errors and some improvement recommendations are discussed.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX